🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The actual danger confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

The Stark Economic Gap Separating Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Question

This widening economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is decidedly US-centric. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a vital question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does Europe stand? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hamper Europe. A US startup can introduce a service under one set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once met with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are reasons for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements could unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in global economic relevance.